New Delhi | Observing that Justice Yashwant Varma's conduct does not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court on Wednesday posed sharp questions to the judge seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row.
The top court asked Justice Varma why did he appear before the in-house inquiry committee and not challenge it then and there.
It told Justice Varma that he should have come earlier to the apex court against the in-house inquiry panel's report.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih said if the Chief Justice of India has material to believe that there is misconduct by a judge then he can inform the president and the prime minister.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Justice Varma, submitted that the in-house inquiry panel's recommendation for his removal is unconstitutional.
Sibal told the court that recommendation of proceedings for removal in this manner would set a dangerous precedent.
The hearing is underway.
You may also like
PM Kisan 20th Installment: ₹2,000 to Be Transferred on August 2 — 70 Lakh Rajasthan Farmers to Benefit
8 Bollywood Movies In Which Age Gap Between Lead Pairs Grabbed Attention & Invited Criticism
E-Aadhaar App Update: QR Code Verification to Eliminate Photocopies and Simplify Aadhaar Updates Nationwide
Zootopia 2 Trailer: Judy Hopps, Nick Wilde's Funny Misadventures Vs Mysterious Gary De'Snake
Heart Health: Always having cold feet can be a sign of heart block, an AIIMS doctor told ways to prevent it..