The US Supreme Court again backed President Donald Trump's hardline approach toward immigration on Monday, letting federal agents proceed with raids in Southern California targeting people for deportation based on their race or language.
The court granted a justice department request to put on hold a federal judge's order temporarily barring agents from stopping or detaining people without "reasonable suspicion" they are in the country illegally, by relying on race or ethnicity, or if they speak Spanish or English with an accent, among other factors.
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision, directing pointed criticism at its conservative majority.
The administration "has all but declared that all Latinos, US citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents' satisfaction," justice Sotomayor wrote in the dissenting opinion. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent," Sotomayor added.
Los Angeles-based US district Judge Maame Frimpong found on July 11 that the Trump administration's actions likely violated the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The judge's order applied to her court's jurisdiction covering much of Southern California.
The Supreme Court's order was brief and issued without any explanation, a common way it handles emergency matters, but one that has generated confusion in lower courts and criticism from some of the justices themselves. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that "apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion" but it can be a "'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors." Reuters
The court granted a justice department request to put on hold a federal judge's order temporarily barring agents from stopping or detaining people without "reasonable suspicion" they are in the country illegally, by relying on race or ethnicity, or if they speak Spanish or English with an accent, among other factors.
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices publicly dissented from the decision, directing pointed criticism at its conservative majority.
The administration "has all but declared that all Latinos, US citizens or not, who work low-wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents' satisfaction," justice Sotomayor wrote in the dissenting opinion. "Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent," Sotomayor added.
Los Angeles-based US district Judge Maame Frimpong found on July 11 that the Trump administration's actions likely violated the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The judge's order applied to her court's jurisdiction covering much of Southern California.
The Supreme Court's order was brief and issued without any explanation, a common way it handles emergency matters, but one that has generated confusion in lower courts and criticism from some of the justices themselves. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that "apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion" but it can be a "'relevant factor' when considered along with other salient factors." Reuters
You may also like
Kean inspires Italy in thriller, Kosovo stun Sweden in FIFA World Cup qualifiers
Sensex up 350 points, Nifty above 24,850; IT stocks lead rally
VP elections: CP Radhakrishan appoints TDP's Ram Mohan Naidu, JDU's Sanjay Kumar Jha as his polling agents
CBSE Board Exams 2026: Registration for Private Candidates Now Open
O2 issues urgent text message warning and you'll pay a heavy price for ignoring it
